« Holiday! | Israeli Rabbis urge pope on anti-Semitism » |
Recollections of Nostra Aetate from someone who was there at the time.
Link: http://www.thetablet.co.uk/cgi-bin/register.cgi/tablet-00695
This article by Cardinal Franz Konig contains some interesting details about the development of the document Nostra Aetate, which marked the start of a change in the Catholic Church’s attitude to Jews. The document was passed by 2,221 votes to 88, but nearly didn't happen, having faced strong opposition from a small but powerful minority of bishops – and from the Christian Arabs.
This briefest of declarations owes its existence to three people without whose determination, dedication and patience it would never have come about. They were Pope John himself, Cardinal Bea and Fr Johannes Österreicher, an Austrian priest and convert from Judaism who had fled from Austria to the United States before the Second World War. John XXIII was determined to put an end to accusations that the Church was anti-Semitic. He had done a great deal to help Jews when he was Apostolic Delegate in Istanbul in the Forties. Shortly after his election, he asked Cardinal Bea to consider how the Jewish question could be incorporated into the council. I was invited to join this small circle early on, and thus experienced at close hand the many crises and continual ups and downs the declaration went through. It is indeed almost a miracle that it was ever passed at all.
Rumours that a declaration on the Jewish question was on the agenda began circulating almost as soon as the council opened. The mere fact that the question was to be discussed at all immediately met with violent opposition from the Arab world, the Eastern Churches and from a small but vociferous conservative group of council bishops around Archbishop Lefebvre. I greatly admire Pope John, Cardinal Bea and Fr Österreicher for persevering despite fierce opposition, intrigue and sometimes outright slander.
Right up to the end of the council this opposition mobilised the mass media and evoked diplomatic protests from the Arab states. I received sacks of letters, many of them from Christians in the Middle East, begging me to prevent a declaration on the Jewish question. Some of the pamphlets that were circulated were positively malicious and defamatory. When the small group of council bishops which was so against any declaration on the subject saw that they could not prevent it, they tried to water it down and continually lodged complaints so that the drafts had to be changed at least three or four times. Finally, however, on 28 October 1965, Nostra Aetate was passed: there were 2,221 votes in favour, 88 against and three abstentions. It had taken four years to reach agreement on a few hundred words! For Karl Rahner, “the wording and inner dynamism” of Nostra Aetate was “unique”.
An effort is made to overturn anti-Semitism and “Right up to the end of the council this opposition mobilised the mass media and evoked diplomatic protests from the Arab states”. Some things don’t change, do they?
In another article,
In Perspective: The Vatican Statement on the Holocaust Mgr George Higgins points out that, in spite of its imperfections (it was much watered down, thanks to its opponents)
Still, it was on the whole a very good declaration and held great promise for the future -- promise that only would be fulfilled if Catholics bore in mind that its solemn promulgation was not the end of the story but only the beginning.
1 comment

Yes, of course. The opponent is always "small". They opposers were poorer, but not "small". Among the group of "Mons. Marcel Lefebvre" were Cardinals Ottaviani, Bacci, Spellman SJ, Cicognani, Siri, Guérard des Lauriers etc. etc. All men of the highest positions under Pius XII.
" I greatly admire Pope John, Cardinal Bea and Fr Österreicher for persevering despite fierce opposition, intrigue and sometimes outright slander. "
Have you seen it. Bea, König and Österreicher were all frustrated German-speaking prelates wanting to "make penance" for nazi crimes by these incredible and blasphemous declarations that went on under the name "Nostra Aetate".
In constrast we will quote H.H. Pope Pius XII, Encyclical "Mystici Corporis", Against Neo-Modernism and False Opinions on the Church, 1943 [1939], par. 29:
"And first of all, by the death of our Redeemer, the New Testament took the place of the Old Law which had been abolished; then the Law of Christ together with its mysteries, enactments, institutions, and sacred rites was ratified for the whole world in the blood of Jesus Christ. For, while our Divine Savior was preaching in a restricted area - He was not sent but to the sheep that were lost of the House of Israel [30] - the Law and the Gospel were together in force; [31] but on the gibbet of His death Jesus made void the Law with its decrees [32] fastened the handwriting of the Old Testament to the Cross, [33] establishing the New Testament in His blood shed for the whole human race.[34] "To such an extent, then," says St. Leo the Great, speaking of the Cross of our Lord, "was there effected a transfer from the Law to the Gospel, from the Synagogue to the Church, from the many sacrifices to one Victim, that, as Our Lord expired, that mystical veil which shut off the innermost part of the temple and its sacred secret was rent violently from top to bottom." [35]"