The struggle continues to persuade the UN to do the right thing. Here is the British attempt.
British diplomats are putting heavy pressure on the United Nations finally to make good its promise to devise an unequivocal definition and condemnation of terrorism.
Any guess just which country has to be treated differently from others?
Yet in the run-up to the UN's annual general assembly and the summit, recent debate has stalled on the classification of Palestinian suicide bombers and Israeli action in the West Bank and Gaza, with some countries questioning whether the definition would apply to the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. Now, British diplomats are pushing hard for the absolute condemnation in the belief that with Britain holding the EU presidency they are arguing from a position of strength.
This subject can also be found on this site's Forum, if anyone wishes to discuss it there.
This blog is a group effort looking into the UN's treatment of Israel, particularly in relation to other states.
Page Naviation:

You can also join the ZOTW mailing list
This blog can be accessed as either:
Past 20 articles
UN's Human Rights ConfusionYou can also search: